Justibly

Shareholder Disputes Attorneys

Oppressive conduct claims under Section 163 of the Companies Act.

JohannesburgPretoriaCape TownDurbanGqeberhaPolokwane
Reviewed by the Justibly editorial team·

Shareholder disputes arise over oppressive conduct, board deadlock, dilution, minority rights, and exit mechanisms. Section 163 of the Companies Act gives relief for oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregarding conduct - a broad and powerful remedy. Sections 161-163 provide statutory remedies for directors, shareholders, and trade unions.

When to hire a shareholder disputes attorney

  • Majority shareholders are acting oppressively.
  • A director or majority is misusing company funds or assets.
  • Minority shareholders are being squeezed out.
  • Board deadlock prevents company operations.
  • You want to buy out a disgruntled co-shareholder.

What to expect

Section 163 applications go to the High Court. Relief is flexible - the court can order buy-outs, setting aside of transactions, damages, director removal, or appointment of administrators. Most matters settle once the application is issued - oppressive conduct is hard to defend and reputationally damaging.

Typical fees

Section 163 application: R80,000-R500,000+. Buy-out negotiations: R30,000-R200,000. Litigation through trial: R400,000-R3M+.

Legal information, not legal advice. This page provides general information about shareholder disputes in South Africa. It is not a substitute for advice from a qualified attorney. Laws and procedures change - consult a verified attorney for your specific matter.

Verified attorneys

No attorneys match your filters.

No attorneys have self-selected this specialisation yet.

Browse all Business & Commercial Law attorneys here →

Frequently Asked Questions